Targeting the Endothelin-1 pathway to reduce invasion and chemoresistance in gallbladder cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a prevalent and deadly biliary tract carcinoma, often diagnosed at advanced stages with limited treatment options. The 5-year survival rate varies widely from 4 to 60%, mainly due to differences in disease stage detection. With only a small fraction of patients having resectable tumors and a high incidence of metastasis, advanced GBC stages are characterized by significant chemoresistance. Identification of new therapeutic targets is crucial, and recent studies have shown that the Endothelin-1 (ET-1) signaling pathway, involving ETAR and/or ETBR receptors (ETRs), plays a crucial role in promoting tumor aggressiveness in various cancer models. Blocking one or both receptors has been reported to reduce invasiveness and chemoresistance in cancers like ovarian, prostate, and colon. Furthermore, transcriptomic studies have associated ET-1 levels with late stages of GBC; however, it remains unclear whether its signaling or its inhibition has implications for its aggressiveness. Although the role of ET-1 signaling in gallbladder physiology is minimally understood, its significance in other tumor models leads us to hypothesize its involvement in GBC malignancy. RESULTS: In this study, we investigated the expression of ET-1 pathway proteins in three GBC cell lines and a primary GBC culture. Our findings demonstrated that both ETAR and ETBR receptors are expressed in GBC cells and tumor samples. Moreover, we successfully down-regulated ET-1 signaling using a non-selective ETR antagonist, Macitentan, which resulted in reduced migratory and invasive capacities of GBC cells. Additionally, Macitentan treatment chemosensitized the cells to Gemcitabine, a commonly used therapy for GBC. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we reveal the role of the ET-1 pathway in GBC cells, providing insight into the potential therapeutic targeting of its receptors to mitigate invasion and chemoresistance in this cancer with limited treatment options. These findings pave the way for further exploration of Macitentan or other ETR antagonists as potential therapeutic strategies for GBC management. In summary, our study represents a groundbreaking contribution to the field by providing the first evidence of the ET 1 pathway's pivotal role in modulating the behavior and aggressiveness of GBC cells, shedding new light on potential therapeutic targets.

Cancer Stem Cell and Aggressiveness Traits Are Promoted by Stable Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1c in Glioblastoma Cells.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive type of brain tumor due to its elevated recurrence following treatments. This is mainly mediated by a subpopulation of cells with stemness traits termed glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs), which are extremely resistant to anti-neoplastic drugs. Thus, an advancement in the understanding of the molecular processes underlying GSC occurrence should contribute significantly towards progress in reducing aggressiveness. High levels of endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE1), key for endothelin-1 (ET-1) peptide activation, have been linked to the malignant progression of GBM. There are four known isoforms of ECE1 that activate ET-1, which only differ in their cytoplasmic N-terminal sequences. Isoform ECE1c is phosphorylated at Ser-18 and Ser-20 by protein kinase CK2, which increases its stability and hence promotes aggressiveness traits in colon cancer cells. In order to study whether ECE1c exerts a malignant effect in GBM, we designed an ECE1c mutant by switching a putative ubiquitination lysine proximal to the phospho-serines Lys-6-to-Arg (i.e., K6R). This ECE1cK6R mutant was stably expressed in U87MG, T98G, and U251 GBM cells, and their behavior was compared to either mock or wild-type ECE1c-expressing clone cells. ECE1cK6R behaved as a highly stable protein in all cell lines, and its expression promoted self-renewal and the enrichment of a stem-like population characterized by enhanced neurospheroid formation, as well as increased expression of stem-like surface markers. These ECE1cK6R-derived GSC-like cells also displayed enhanced resistance to the GBM-related chemotherapy drugs temozolomide and gemcitabine and increased expression of the ABCG2 efflux pump. In addition, ECE1cK6R cells displayed enhanced metastasis-associated traits, such as the modulation of adhesion and the enhancement of cell migration and invasion. In conclusion, the acquisition of a GSC-like phenotype, together with heightened chemoresistance and invasiveness traits, allows us to suggest phospho-ECE1c as a novel marker for poor prognosis as well as a potential therapeutic target for GBM.

The low affinity A2B adenosine receptor enhances migratory and invasive capacity in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo of glioblastoma stem-like cells.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly malignant brain tumor, with a median survival of 15 to 17 months for a patient. GBM contains a cellular subpopulation known as GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) that persist in hypoxic niches and are capable of infiltrating into healthy brain tissue. For this reason, GSCs are considered one of the main culprits for GBM recurrence. A hypoxic microenvironment increases extracellular adenosine levels, activating the low affinity A2B adenosine receptor (A2BAR). Adenosine, through A2BAR, is capable of modulating invasiveness. However, its role in the invasion/migration of hypoxic-GSCs is still unknown. This study aims to understand the importance of A2BAR in modulating the migratory/invasive capacity of GSCs under hypoxia. Data analysis from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program correlates A2BAR expression with high-grade glioma and hypoxic necrotic areas. U87MG and primary culture-derived GSCs under hypoxic conditions (0.5% O2) increased A2BAR mRNA and protein levels. As expected, the migratory and invasive capacity of GSCs increased under hypoxia, which was counteracted by blocking A2BAR, through the downregulation of MMP9 activity and epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker expression. Finally, in a xenograft mouse model, we demonstrate that treatment with MRS1754 did not affect the tumor volume but could decrease blood vessel formation and VEGF expression. Our results suggest that extracellular adenosine, through the activation of A2BAR, enhances the migratory and invasive capacity of GSCs in vitro under hypoxic conditions. Targeting A2BAR can be an effective therapy for GBM recurrence.

Adapt to Persist: Glioblastoma Microenvironment and Epigenetic Regulation on Cell Plasticity.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive brain tumor, characterized by great resistance to treatments, as well as inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. GBM exhibits infiltration, vascularization and hypoxia-associated necrosis, characteristics that shape a unique microenvironment in which diverse cell types are integrated. A subpopulation of cells denominated GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) exhibits multipotency and self-renewal capacity. GSCs are considered the conductors of tumor progression due to their high tumorigenic capacity, enhanced proliferation, invasion and therapeutic resistance compared to non-GSCs cells. GSCs have been classified into two molecular subtypes: proneural and mesenchymal, the latter showing a more aggressive phenotype. Tumor microenvironment and therapy can induce a proneural-to-mesenchymal transition, as a mechanism of adaptation and resistance to treatments. In addition, GSCs can transition between quiescent and proliferative substates, allowing them to persist in different niches and adapt to different stages of tumor progression. Three niches have been described for GSCs: hypoxic/necrotic, invasive and perivascular, enhancing metabolic changes and cellular interactions shaping GSCs phenotype through metabolic changes and cellular interactions that favor their stemness. The phenotypic flexibility of GSCs to adapt to each niche is modulated by dynamic epigenetic modifications. Methylases, demethylases and histone deacetylase are deregulated in GSCs, allowing them to unlock transcriptional programs that are necessary for cell survival and plasticity. In this review, we described the effects of GSCs plasticity on GBM progression, discussing the role of GSCs niches on modulating their phenotype. Finally, we described epigenetic alterations in GSCs that are important for stemness, cell fate and therapeutic resistance.

Current Therapeutic Alternatives and New Perspectives in Glioblastoma Multiforme.

BACKGROUND: In the last two decades, there have been significant technological advances in the early detection of brain tumors. However, no notable improvements have been observed in the treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), the most common brain neoplasm coupled with the worst prognosis. GBM is characterized by an extensive resistance to a broad spectrum of anti-tumor drugs. This property is the result of a phenomenon known as Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR), which significantly limits noninvasive alternative therapies. This limitation is primarily due to the activity of ABC transporters and proteins related with DNA repair such as the MGMT enzyme. Due to the high mortality rate in GBM patients and current treatment deficits, new therapeutic strategies for this type of neoplasm are of vital importance. METHODS: In this review, proposed treatments for GBM, including the use of alkylating agents with MGMT inhibitors, MDR modulators, and immunotherapies are discussed. We focused our bibliographic research on papers containing in vitro, in vivo, and clinical phase analysis published over the last 20 years. RESULTS: Several studies have demonstrated good results using alkylating agents plus MGMT inhibitors, although without great improvements in survival. The use of modulators of ABC transporters enhances the effects of chemotherapy, proving it an effective complementary therapy. Immunotherapies have undergone significant developments as a directed and personalized approach for GBM treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of alternative complementary therapies discussed in this review could increase the survival of GBM patients; however, additional clinical phase analysis and the generation of new treatment protocols are required.